Agency moves from 90-year to 30-year forecast model to account for streamflows increasingly impacted by climate change.

wave

BPA has studied the effects of climate change for nearly 15 years

to better evaluate and anticipate vulnerabilities, risk and resiliency of the Federal Columbia River Power System.

Water supply is the lifeblood of the federal hydropower system. Regional shifts in streamflows have prompted the Bonneville Power Administration to revise its generation forecast methodology to more accurately reflect a Northwest water supply impacted by climate change.

For more than eight decades, BPA relied on a data set of hydrological conditions in the Pacific Northwest that stretched back to 1929 and used the 1937 water year as the baseline for determining firm power generation. However, the conditions seen in 1937, or indeed much of the first half of that 90-year record, are becoming less likely to happen again as regional climate continues to warm.
 
Bonneville is now using the three most recent decades of hydrologic data to inform near-term future generation estimates. The change better reflects current hydrologic conditions in a changing climate.

Current climate change trends being observed in the Pacific Northwest include:
  • Warming, especially in interior portions of the region.
  • Earlier spring snowmelt in U.S. portions of the Columbia River Basin.
  • Higher winter and early spring flows.
  • Slightly earlier spring runoff.
  • Longer periods of low summer flows.

With these shifts in climatological conditions, a recurrence of the 1937 water year (extremely low winter flows coupled with high summer flows) is highly unlikely. That probability will further decline as the impacts of a warming climate continue to unfold in the region.

A bump in firm generation

Firm generation is power marketed by BPA that contains a guarantee of delivery at all contracted times. Under the Regional Dialogue contracts, low-cost Tier 1 power sold to preference customers is based on firm generation from the federal system.  

To be able to offer firm generation, BPA must have a high confidence level of being able to meet its commitments to customers. This leads to a typically conservative modeling approach in identifying the levels of generation relative to the available water supply. 

BPA shifted from using a single water year to adopting what is called a 10th percentile, or P10, approach for determining firm generation for the federal system. This new approach sets firm generation at the tenth percent of monthly averages of forecast generation based on the most recent 30 years of streamflow data. This establishes a level of firm generation that recognizes the risk of low streamflow conditions, but is not attached to the shape and timing of runoff from a single water year, like 1937.

The result of changing methodologies to capture emerging climate change signals resulted in slightly less forecast overall annual generation – a decrease of 87 average megawatts out of more than 11,000 aMW. However, it also enabled BPA to move about 218 aMW from non-firm to firm generation, mostly in the winter and early spring months.

This more accurate depiction of current streamflows and available firm generation has a direct benefit to BPA’s customers, as it will reduce power rate pressures by decreasing the volatility between generation forecasts to actual generation. 

What prompted the change?

BPA’s original method for near-future generation availability was built on an underlying assumption that the historical streamflows dating back to 1929 are all equally probable and represent a reasonable range of future streamflow possibilities. However, BPA and other regional analyses indicate that over the last several decades increasing temperatures throughout the Columbia River Basin have altered streamflows to the point that the original assumptions no longer matched the reality of the region’s changing water supply.

BPA has studied the effects of climate change for nearly 15 years to better evaluate and anticipate vulnerabilities, risk and resiliency of the Federal Columbia River Power System. BPA was the principal funder for a large climate change research assessment by the River Management Joint Operating Committee published in 2018 and 2020. Those studies and analyses conducted by the University of Washington and Oregon State University have resulted in the best regional understanding of the future hyrdoclimate for the Pacific Northwest, with additional studies and recent climate trends confirming the results.

For more information about the changes to BPA’s forecasting, see the letter to the region on Climate Change Update to the Long-Term Hydro Generation Forecast. For more information on BPA’s efforts related to climate resiliency and better understanding climate change in the Pacific Northwest, see the Climate Change & FCRPS page on BPA.gov

Related News